.NET needs its enormous Runtime |
So? Many languages and libraries require large runtimes. GTK, Java, etc. Nothing wrong with that.
.NET code reversing is too easy |
It's easy to reverse engineer any language, regardless of if it's compiled or interpreted. It's just slightly easier with .NET and Java, but still easy with C++.
Actually, overall .NET is only about 10-15% slower than running a native application. But this really would come down to the individual developers ability to write good code.
Most of .NET developers are kids, who even don't know what is Win32 API or a message loop, and can only click, click, click... on a black box. |
Actually, I've yet to meet a .NET developer who is a kid. I know many professional developers who are quite fond of .NET. So you have no idea what you are talking about. Are you even a prof developer or just a kid yourself?
Arrogant statement. Would you care to elaborate?
I've yet to see a helpful reply from you, nor have I seen any valid arguments against anything you have tried to argue. Your definitely a Microsoft fanboy, but I'd hate to break this to you, there are other operating systems and programming languages out there; And they are GOOD. Just because you know a little C++ and some Win32API doesn't make it the best, or only good one.