spoon licker...

Pages: 12
Jan 3, 2012 at 10:59am
Whose burning who what? I hate how these posts keep dissapearing. I feel like I'm talking to myself.
Jan 3, 2012 at 12:03pm
Let's make this thread interesting and play Let's guess who Spoonlicker is!
Could be Albatross, rendering this thread a ludicrous cry for attention.
Jan 3, 2012 at 5:56pm
If I'm spoon licker, then George W. Bush is the best president the United States of America has ever had and will ever have. Need I say more? :/

EDIT: What if Bush was spoon licker? That'd be a laugh.

-Albatross
Last edited on Jan 3, 2012 at 6:16pm
Jan 3, 2012 at 6:15pm
closed account (1vRz3TCk)
Henry, the mild mannered janitor? COULD BE!
Jan 3, 2012 at 7:09pm
Martha, the murderous sociopath? COULD BE!
Jan 3, 2012 at 7:58pm
I don't think it's Albatross, unless she has Multiple Personality Disorder.
Jan 3, 2012 at 11:24pm
Or Dissociated Personality Disorder, she would never know she was Spoon licker.
Jan 4, 2012 at 12:01am
I keep forgetting she's a she X)
Jan 4, 2012 at 3:14am
And we'd like to keep it that way :P I'm sure everyone here, Ably included, would not be fond of being treated differently because of their gender. Science in particular seems to have a problem with that (though much of the world does)
Jan 5, 2012 at 1:49am
Well, it depends.

If the sort of treatment I'd get for being female is in the same category as "T**S OR GTFO", then I absolutely wouldn't appreciate it. If, however, the community goes a little bit out of its way to avoid sensitive issues when talking specifically to me, then yes, I don't mind it at all. ;)

As for scientific studies... well, sometimes they have their reasons for the separation of genders, especially in Psychology. It took me a while to understand it, but now it doesn't bug me as much.

So far, you've all been a nice bunch. :)

-Albatross
Jan 5, 2012 at 2:55am
So far, you've all been a nice bunch. :)

Grrrrrrrrr....grrin!
Jan 5, 2012 at 3:18am
Well, actually I was referring to the fact that many fields of science are still dominated by men and it's common speculation that this is in part due to how reluctant they are to accept research conducted by women.
Jan 5, 2012 at 3:49am
Ah. Well. That's another story. DOWN WITH MALE CHAUVINIST SCIENTISTS! YOU LOT SHOULD KNOW BETTER!

-Albatross
Jan 5, 2012 at 4:11am
I've never understood why at some point during the development of our ancestors that they started to separate roles by gender. While it may have been an easy way to decide who does what, I don't see how it came to be girly-girls vs manly-men. The whole 'becoming a man' thing seems like just another overhyped point in my developmental timeline. (birthdays are a good example...)
Jan 5, 2012 at 1:07pm
"at some point during the development"? I think it started out that way and gradually declined [except for periods where religions came up, but whatever]. Men have always been the warriors and hunters, women the mothers and gatherers. Maybe it's because men are better built for physical challenges. Maybe men were simply more aggressive. Maybe it's because a woman can only birth a child roughly once a year, but one man can impregnate a woman every day easily, making men more expendable and thus fit for dangerous tasks.

The fact is: there are differences between genders. There are things a man is just better suited for, just like there are things a woman can do better. It upsets me when I see women claiming to be blocked at job interviews because they're a woman. Yes, it happens, but it's far more often that the person simply isn't fit for the job. Then they bring up statistics of only 10% of managers being female. Maybe that's sexism, or maybe it's just that the qualities required for managarial tasks are just more often found in men.

A few months back I read an article on a conference that received complaints it never invited female guestspeakers. Turns out, they did their best to invite female speakers, a) there weren't that many women in the field, and b) most of them refused.

It's very easy to hide behind gender discrimination [and I'm certain it's still a big issue in our society], but more often than not it can be attributed to the differences between genders. Full equality is retarded. Equal rights, of course, is not.
Jan 5, 2012 at 1:53pm
There was no evidence of gender separation until a certain point.
Jan 5, 2012 at 2:49pm
And when exactly was that then?
Topic archived. No new replies allowed.
Pages: 12