cplusplus.com site upgrade for C++0x

[ireni]

Hi people,

First, sorry if a similar topic already exists, but if, I didn't find it.

Will the web site (say cplusplus.com of course) be updated with all new C++0x release features (new STL containers, etc ...) ? Is something planned by site admin ?

I really hope so :)

Thanks.

[Catfish]

Who cares? (No offense.) There is http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp which happens to have a "site archives download" section so people don't need to mess with wget if they want the glossary offline.

If http://cplusplus.com/ has any value, it lies in the people on this forum. Well in some of them.

Even then, if you have a serious question you're better off asking it at http://stackoverflow.com/

Have a nice day.

[ireni]

Thanks for your answer, but I do care about that, even if other web sites provide informations about C++0x features.

I would like that cpluplus.com to be updated with C++0x features. I hope so it will be done one day ;)

[ne555]

The reference in cppreference is incomplete. By instance there is nothing about valarray (slice, gslice, mask), and they are from the old standar.
Also google lucky sends me to this page, and I don't want another bookmark xP.

[Albatross]

I don't see why we're not writing articles about this so that when the time comes to upgrade the site, the site admin doesn't have to do nearly as much work.

-Albatross

[garob]

Speaking about references and this site isn't the function definition on this page http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/vector/operator%5B%5D/ wrong? This could be on other pages too, just know about this one.

[Catfish]

@ garob:
What function definition, there are only declarations there.
And more importantly, what do you think is wrong about it?

I don't see why we're not writing articles about this so that when the time comes to upgrade the site, the site admin doesn't have to do nearly as much work.

Probably because most people have a false sense of endurance they feel their work must inherit.
Beginner and medium level C++11 articles will (and should) become totally redundant the instant this site upgrades.

[ireni]

The fact is that it's a reflex for me to come here when i need informations about a C/C++ feature with, most often, source code example ;)

So my question about a possible C++0x site upgrade.

[Galik]

I have not found a C++ reference site as good as this one for its ease of use. I would love to see it upgraded for C++11.

[ireni]

So do I ;)