Instead, you could try to be thoughtful when purchasing (or making - things from the "heart" are always good) a gift |
Good gifts are born from either functionality or spontaneity.
- A gift that someone will actually use but they never got around to getting themselves, didn't think to get themselves, or didn't want to blow money on themselves is a good gift. For example if you know someone who drinks wine all the time and you buy them a fancy corkscrew that's nicer than any corkscrew they were willing to spend on a corkscrew for themselves -- that would be a good gift (as long as they didn't already have a satisfactory corkscrew). It's functional.
- When you're shopping and you see something funny and you think "so and so would really like that" so you get it and they like it, it's a good gift. It's spontaneous.
Christmas gifts are neither of those things. They're
almost bad gifts by very definition.
When you go to a store with the objective of looking for a gift for a specific person, it's not spontaneous. It's even less spontaneous when there's a predetermined date on which you are expected to exchange said gift.
And functional gifts are often thought of as "bad" gifts because they're not "from the heart" as you say. "It's the thought that counts" is kind a bullshit saying. It implies that if you don't put thought into a gift it's a bad gift. Or it implies that any gift that you really thought about is a good gift. Neither of those are even remotely close to the truth.
For example my sister said she wanted an iPod but couldn't afford one, so I bought her one. I sure didn't put any thought into the gift -- I mean she basically told me what to buy her, and I bought it for her. Does that make it a bad gift? I don't think so, because it's functional. She uses it, and she enjoys it, and that makes both of us happy. It's a good gift.
Money is another big one. If you get money for someone for Christmas you're generally considered to be a thoughtless turd. Yet I know all sorts of people who would way rather have (and are in much greater need of) money than something more "thoughtful", like a handknit sweater that they'd never wear. Money is more functional. But does that really make it a bad gift?
Regarding the other point, thoughtful gifts aren't always good. I've gotten weird trickets in the past that I didn't have any use for, and that I wouldn't really want to keep, but I felt obligated to keep them because I didn't want to hurt the gift giver's feelings. So then I was left with all this clutter around that I never used but couldn't get rid of. But the thing is I
know they put a lot of thought into the gift -- it's just that I'm hard to shop for. I know they spent hours cruising up and down shopping aisles wondering "what would Disch like this year?". So is it really the thought that counts? Was that a good gift even though I didn't like it, never used it, and I wished they didn't waste their money on it for me? I'd say no, it was a bad gift.
Now that's not to say that non-functional, non-spontaneous gifts can never be good. But they're usually not.
(or making - things from the "heart" are always good) |
Unless you're some kind of amazing artist or craftsperson, handmade gifts are almost always bad gifts. About the only exception is trinkets little kids make -- and that's mainly because kids are cute.
and enjoy being with friends and family. |
I'd like that. But it's impossible when you're the asshole who didn't get anyone anything.
Have you ever tried it? I have. I felt like a total prick. I even told everyone repeatedly not to get me anything because I wasn't going to get them anything, and I wouldn't feel left out at all. Of course none of them listened and that holiday sucked worse than most.
So the being with friends and family thing comes at a price. A price that frankly I'm not willing to pay. So I'll spend time with my family for the
real holiday, Thanksgiving, where there's no bullshit prerequisite to sitting down and having a good time with your family.