I can't speak for Cubbi, but in my experience, it's always more satisfying and more productive to work with people who are happy to collaborate and communicate. Teamwork gets stuff done much more effectively than everyone working in their own little silos. If the nature of the job is going to be "Here, go away into your little corner and do this, and don't bother me till you're finished," then I don't want to be there.
That applies to the relationship with managers as much as it does to other developers.
Remember, when you're doing a job interview, you're interviewing the employer to find out whether you want to work for them, just as they're interviewing you to find out if they want you working for them.
I do appreciate that when you're starting your career, it's hard to get that first position, so you might not be able to afford to be too choosy. But you don't know what sort of person your interviewer is going to be, so take the approach that's right for you, rather than tying yourself up in knots trying to decide whether they're going to approve or disapprove of asking questions.
As someone who's been on both sides of the interview table several times, asking intelligent questions has always given a better impression than simply sitting there in silence. Proving that you're able to think about something is always a posititve. Proving that you can communicate well is always a positive. Proving that you can take steps to find out information you need to solve a problem should be a positive, and any employer that didn't think so is not an employer that I'd enjoy working for.