What is shocking is how a world class site like this one can allow a junior like zapshe to continue offering bad advice as if he is speaking on this sites behalf. |
*
Sigh* Most of what we're talking about now isn't even that coding related. My knowledge and advice is spot on (I'm obviously bias) and am a Lenovo affiliate because of it. When I say something, I know what I'm talking about, do you?
The only person who demonstrated decency on this was JL Borges |
He clearly told you that your program needs considerable work. Sure, you and your company may become respectable and do great things one day. Just not until you fix the issues - which you're not willing to. You took constructive criticism and threw it out the window, now you get insults and rude criticism :)
It's to the point where I literally linked you a website like stackoverflow to the sub-category of cryptography where they said exactly what I and everyone else here said.
But no, you think we're wrong because of personal emotions rather than logical deductions.
Notice how none of you were able to raise one valid negative point toward KtxMnu yet here we are in this dialog 3 pages later. |
I'm certain many don't like that I'm continuing this, but I'm the only reason we're 3 pages in. Also, there are MANY points against you, incompetence, arrogance-based-on-emotion, and hard-headedness just to name a few. They come from the fact that you couldn't figure out a simple program, can't figure out how to edit the registry, and can't possibly fathom the
FACT that making your own algorithm is a bad idea and that your programs so far need I/O tweaking to be a usable option by 99% of people.
All that I have been doing was to refute all invalid points made - like the top 10 context menu apps |
No point I've made is invalid. The 10 context menu applications where from a quick Google search to show you that yours isn't special. You tried to attack it saying it doesn't work, and I shoved it in your face that it did. You show the lack of competence and intelligence in yourself and the rest of your team.
Please note that I had the right to report zapshe for calling me a "f*cking liar" and Duthomhas for saying I am full of poop (ie shit) but I did not report them. |
You'd report people for saying the truth? Lol
No we would welcome negative reviews as well as long as they can be substantiated. |
Look at this story as a metaphor:
A woman walks her dog one day while she's eating chocolate. She gives the dog some since he begs and continues to do so at least once a week. Someone sees you and says, "You shouldn't give your dog chocolate, it's not good for them. You should train the dog to avoid chocolate!" You say, "Never hurt him before! I don't care about your advice!" Of course, your claim is based on the fact that you haven't seen this person's warning have any consequences. However, one day, you come back to a dead dog who went into your stash of dark chocolate and ate it all.
I've shown you the sources, everyone here has given you the basic breakdown, and you refuse to accept where your company screwed up. Again, a MASTER cryptographer said ANYONE CAN MAKE AN ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM THAT THEY THEMSELVES CAN'T BREAK, it means
NOTHING in terms of how good it actually is. No one here as far as I know works as a cryptographer, so even if we can't break it (which I believe even I probably could), that would mean nothing in terms of if someone who knows what their doing wants to break it.
Had we not have been that side tacked we would have responded by saying thank you for letting us know about the alarm raised |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nYNo7B3esY
If you notice zapshe commented on how ugly KtxMnu looked when it has not front end.
How can such a person comment be taken serious. |
Are you looking for sweet talk or facts? If it's ugly, it's ugly. I'm not gonna sit here and tell you, "You see Ang, the application was simply delightful, but I think it could be improved upon just a tad." I shoved the facts in your face and your too sheltered in your own BS to accept it.
When zapshe promoted the top 10 context menu tools which are all from American based companies and continued to disregard my solution despite my one actually solving the issue defined then I inferred it was due to him being patriotic and not racist as you wrongfully assumed here. |
I told you I found the site in a few seconds, I'm far from patriotic. Also, you know full well you meant racism and not patriotism.
I too am patriotic but if my country built a rocket/spaceship that was proven faulty then I would not board it regardless of how patriotic I am. |
But if your company makes a faulty program you'd shove it in customer's faces because your prideful and blind.
continued making a bold claim that he would rather edit the registry manually to cater for our KtxMnu's functionality. |
I've done it before to change certain Window's features as needed. Honestly, figuring out the registry was a far simpler task than going through the stupidity of your program.
You lost due to your top 10 solutions failing to live up to your claims |
You're actually as dumb as a creationist. It worked exactly as it was supposed to, and you only tried ONE of the 10 programs.
Show us how to manually update the registry such that an app like BackupFile with its associated icon can be added to the right click context menu |
No. The program you tried does this, there's no need. It's very possible and I can do it, but even if I showed you exactly how and you were able to do it, you'd simply say, "And you think this is easier than using my program!?" Which my answer to that would be "yes".
RIP while I enjoy my victory!!! |
LOL. Yep, as dumb as they come. It's like saying, "If you look past all the idiotic claims and stupidity I've done, forget all the shattering points you've made that I ignored, and then look at this cheap point I made that can easily be addressed, I win!"
The rest of what you said is like 50 lines of worthless rant that has already been refuted. |
It's easy to ignore facts by saying, "I don't need to think about it, it's already been refuted." Not realizing that it wasn't refuted and that your incompetent brain deserves to be dissected in a lab while you're alive and without any numb-juice.
Notice that you have now been asked multiple times to answer what you so boldly claimed you can do. |
WHY would I? It would frankly be a bother to explain all the steps and long registry names. You figure it yourself if you're so curious:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjTp5o65cQU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nX7Iy6JJZg
But I know you'll still say something like, "But my program does *insert vague description that no one would actually use but can still be done via registry*"
If you continue to fail to provide the answer/proof then you expose yourself as a fool. |
That's rich coming from you.
You look very silly when you claim to have abilities that you don't, because when you are called out on them and are unable to put action to words, then you unfortunately end up looking the fool as you do right now. |
I need to find words more powerful than stupid/dumb/retarded in order to convey what I think about you; prove me wrong by taking this IQ test and telling me how much you score.
http://www.myiqtested.com/
By no means an end all be all, but it should give me a general idea of where you stand. Screenshot preferably.