Also there's not that much point in looking at porn anyway. It's usually not that good. You can often tell that those involved are faking and the video quality tends to be bad. Not to mention that the camera operator has an annoying tendency to move the camera at inopportune times, and usually just to focus on the guy's balls anyway (which is extremely off-putting). And then you have both actor's poor attempts at "improving" the already inexpertly made video, with the worst one being when one of them shouts "shit". If that is what you're thinking about during (non-anal) sex, you have serious issues. If you're thinking about shit during anal sex, then you should probably ask the other party to use an enema; and in the mean time you need to rigorously wash your genitals.
Edit: And the music, while hilarious, isn't well-suited to the situation.
I get live streams from my imagination with no compression, no lag, no acting and featuring people I know IRL anyway so porn is only really when I feel like it.
Blurriness and bad lighting does wonders to mask skin imperfections, and when you're watching porn, the last thing you want to think about is how many moles you can count on someone's back.
That reminds me of something I saw once. I was happily browsing a thread on /s/ about some identical twins when someone pointed out that one of them had ringworm on her hip. It's kind of stupid really; GIMP and Photoshop both have tools with the ability to mask things like that and they weren't videos, so it's not like you have 4 billion frames to modify.
Do what? Remove visible evidence of fungal infections for the purpose of increasing the quality of an image? Or when they point something out that you would rather not know?