The matter of using libido triggering images in order to make people click an article

Pages: 123456... 8
Jun 10, 2019 at 6:11pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
I mean consequences, good fish! also the graph has been added, you asked for a citation

but it's just false.
Ok, i will get back to you on that
Last edited on Jun 10, 2019 at 6:13pm
Jun 10, 2019 at 6:33pm
The graph would seem to suggested no correlation between porn and rape. Only in recent years has the number gone up a tad, but the graph shows nothing about the rape figures before 1960 so we can see if rape has actually gone up after porn came to be.
Jun 10, 2019 at 6:54pm
We would also need to see data on pornography consumption.
Jun 10, 2019 at 6:59pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
We would also need to see data on pornography consumption.
That will not arrive. I will not risk stumbling upon sexual content.
Jun 10, 2019 at 7:08pm
So basically you're admitting that you're pulling conclusions out of your ass.
Jun 10, 2019 at 7:11pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
So basically you're admitting that you're pulling conclusions out of your sixth sense.
Please use more apropriate analogies. No, this is from a source I was lucky to stumble upon, I do not search into this matter, last time I did so I may well have died. On the inside

Quick question I wish only to elaborate on minorly, you did say sarcastically, according to my policy, you would harm your child if he did such. I take it you have a spouse, correct? If so, then in a sense you have found greater pleasure in digital, instant sexual content than your very wife? One's spouse may interpret such this way
Last edited on Jun 10, 2019 at 7:16pm
Jun 10, 2019 at 7:40pm
No, this is from a source I was lucky to stumble upon, I do not search into this matter, last time I did so I may well have died.
Accepting random claims you find wherever without bothering to fact-check them is basically equivalent to coming up with conclusions yourself. The point is your opinion is divorced from reality. You come up with or hear some random proposition that makes you go "yeah, that sounds reasonable" and that's what you think reasoning is.

I take it you have a spouse, correct? If so, then in a sense you have found greater pleasure in digital, instant sexual content than your very wife? One's spouse may interpret such this way
1. What if we watch it together? Is that not a possibility?
2. What if only one of us is in the mood at a given time? Are we supposed to only relieve ourselves with each other or not at all? Why? What's the point?
3. Your question presupposes that sex is objectively better than masturbation. Is it inconceivable that someone, for one reason or another, might sometimes prefer to masturbate and other times prefer to have sex, even when they're both possible alternatives? This is another pattern I've seen from you: you seem to think only in extremes. If someone wants something now they must always want that thing, and they'll never change their mind. People don't have moods.
Jun 10, 2019 at 7:47pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
sex is objectively better than masturbation
(not justifying it) wives are different I suppose, but i asked the question imagining you did it discreetly from your spouse, in that case such can destroys years worth marriage, a spouse may think, "Am i not beautiful enough for him" etc. I just don't see the logic in a woman happily accepting that their beloved husband watches other naked women
Last edited on Jun 10, 2019 at 7:49pm
Jun 10, 2019 at 8:05pm
I just don't see the logic in a woman happily accepting that their beloved husband watches other naked women
Some people are insecure like that. I think getting jealous about what someone else sees or thinks is senseless.
Jun 10, 2019 at 8:12pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
I think getting jealous about what someone else sees
It's the surge of concern that it may arrouse which astonishes me. The concern, judging from your posts, they lack

Hah, drageed the submit into the text box and it showed this:
javascript:editbox1.editSend() The irony. are you forced to use the word "javascript" when coding these things, the word c++, i think, incredibly rarely occurs in the code. Yet in France the ethinicity is more critical than other elements of your identity, I do image in a french shop...

Client "I want to buy toast"
Keeper "what?"
Client "I want to buy toast"
Keeper "what?"
Client "I want to buy toast"
Keeper "what?"
Client "Oh excuse my english, I want to buy french toast"
Keeper "Yes sir"
Last edited on Jun 10, 2019 at 8:17pm
Jun 10, 2019 at 9:50pm
Well this has been slightly weird.

I will not risk stumbling upon sexual content.

To do proper research, you've sometimes got to delve into stuff you don't want to. Not wanting to risk seeing sexual content is like never studying sea life because you don't want to see something weird or disgusting down there.

Plus, searching up something like "Is there a correlation between porn and rape" probably wouldn't turn up much sexual content. Simply check the URL before you click it.
Jun 15, 2019 at 5:43pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
To do proper research, you've sometimes got to delve into stuff you don't want to. Not wanting to risk seeing sexual content is like never studying sea life because you don't want to see something weird or disgusting down there.
Rascake in this topic was not the original account creator, it was the views of another person. So I guess they did the research (cowardly? To be fair this was 2v2)
Last edited on Jun 15, 2019 at 5:44pm
Jun 15, 2019 at 5:47pm
Multiple people using your account?
Jun 15, 2019 at 5:48pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
I know somebody who has a strong opinion on this matter. So i just executed on his behalf
Jun 15, 2019 at 7:04pm
I'm sorry but you don't get to do that. If you're speaking for someone else you to say so clearly and immediately. You can't go "oh, it was actually someone else's words" when you realize you've put your foot in your mouth.
Jun 15, 2019 at 7:10pm
I know somebody who has a strong opinion on this matter. So i just executed on his behalf

Agree with Helios. Plus, at the very least you'd have to concede that you agree with this person since your argument seemed to stem from something personal. You also said you don't wanna "risk" stumbling onto sexual content.
Jun 15, 2019 at 7:11pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
You also said you don't wanna "risk" stumbling onto sexual content.
Yes, for that reason I use his claims, not my own.
Last edited on Jun 15, 2019 at 7:12pm
Jun 15, 2019 at 7:13pm
Umm.. Sure 🤷‍♂️👀
Jun 15, 2019 at 7:15pm
closed account (367kGNh0)
please. Why the eyes?

Wow, both you and the helios' recent posts are in my lounge topics. most five atleast.

I guess now we're free to start a new discussion on this matter. Now, you could say, when it comes to skills in the matter of coding, it is good to get a variety of them in coding, employability, versatility and finding a better language over the other are among the reasons why. Now, you said you may have gained a few skills from watching pornography, but are they really of use, if (i take it they were intercourse skills, belch) if even the un-taught means in the end make a baby?

could you say same for coding, let's are Bjarn Stroutstoup
"Well, actually, a gun made with C would shoot you in the leg. A C++ gun would blow your whole foot off" (I know he did not say it like that, but you see the difference)
Last edited on Jun 15, 2019 at 7:21pm
Jun 15, 2019 at 7:23pm
The eyes of Judgement! MUHAHAHAHA !

0:30 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2hXuUcagK8
Pages: 123456... 8