we are still ultimately being fine tuned by something in order to converge to a final state. |
There are three unproven assumptions in this sentence.
First, that life is being fine tuned, in any sense. While it's true that individual species adapt to their environment, that doesn't imply that life taken as a whole adapts, except to those things that are common throughout the Earth (gravity, radiation, etc.). If this is what you mean by "fine tuning" then I guess you could say that ultimately life on Earth is on the whole progressing towards a state where it can survive on an Earth-like planet. Yes, it's a really weak statement. Such is life.
Second, the "in order" implies that evolution has a goal, which is either false or extremely not apparent. It's easy to get trapped into an anthropocentric view of evolution and to look at your own genealogy as a clear progression towards humanity. However if, say, a jellyfish was somehow capable of such thoughts, it would also conclude that evolution has been leading up to it.
Third, that life tends to converge. If you look at the history of life, the exact opposite becomes evident. It has never been observed that two initially different species mutated in such a way that they became capable of producing fertile hybrids. What we see constantly is populations of the same species becoming isolated from each other, adapting to their different environments differently, and then branching off into separate species.
Is all of this just some super being's play thing used to determine the best strategy for Civilization V? What do you guys think? |
I think that anything can be interpreted as anything else, if we are sufficiently flexible with our interpretation. Regardless of the specific form of one's reality, it's always possible to speculate that some cosmic being is interpreting one's existence in a way that makes sense only to them. There's little point in discussing something that might be true or false, and both cases would look exactly the same from our perspective.