They did it by passing a beam of light through a small cloud of atoms cooled to temperatures a billion times colder than those in the spaces between stars.
Wtf does that mean? You can't be a billion times colder than a temperature... that's retarded.
What is "5x colder" than 70 degrees?
Normally I wouldn't mind. But it's a fucking science article. From Harvard. Get your shit together, guys.
@LB: The unit for the Kelvin scale is a 'kelvin', not a 'degree'. You would just say "14 Kelvin".
Also, even if you're right... that's awkwardly worded at best. You typically don't say "5x as <negative>"... you would say "1/5th as <positive>" or "20% of <positive>".
IE, if I am wearing 3 articles of clothing and I remove two of them... I wouldn't say I'm "3 times as naked". That statement doesn't make any sense.
Lastly, by that definition, a billion times colder than anything outside of a star is going to be extremely close to absolute 0. If they are in fact getting that close to absolute 0 it would be much more impressive to state the actual temperature they achieved.
Indeed, it's the speed of light in vacuum that's constant Light in everything else moves slower (and faster-than-light travel in, for example, water, is well studied and nothing unusual)
Cubbi is right. Light does, after all, travel much slower in water than it does in a vacuum- it doesn't mean that something in water can't travel faster than the light around it in water.