They were different people as far as I know, I do not know why Cyber left, but I do know Space Worm left because of the attack he was placed under in the afore mentioned thread.
EDIT: At time of posting count=1221 palindrom, next one=1331
but I do know Space Worm left because of the attack he was placed under in the afore mentioned thread.
"Attack"? It is perfectly understandable, not being able to deliver what you aren't able to deliver. Less so, blaming your inability on others pointing it out in the first place.
Attack? In an era where it is common to find people lying about their abilities it concerns me that so many members of this site takes everything at face value. For example, SpaceWorm in one post, claimed CyberWarfare was his brother, then in the anti-virus thread said he was just a guy he knew to only later backtrack and have some bs excuse about it being his brother and he doesn't like acknowledging his family members. His anti-virus image was just too damn generic, and looks like something you could have thrown together in GIMP or other image editor.
@Script Coder
Don't you find it odd that he claimed to have worked with other members on this site and none of them came to his defense? I think he even claimed you and he worked on a project together at one point and part of the code is yours as well as claiming part of his code was 'his brothers' from a previous thread. Not to mention his lines of code and file size ratio he gave can be proven a lie as the Linux Kernel was smaller than the size he claimed and had way more LOC than he claimed.
It's not an attack when you can prove the person is lying about their abilities or project.
I do believe he did make an antivirus. He had had it on his profile for a long time. And, a long time ago, I mentioned something about a very simple antivirus that I made and his response was here:
http://v2.cplusplus.com/forum/lounge/108234/#msg588353
(I am actually surprised I found that as the 5th or 6th link in my google search :D)
Don't you find it odd that he claimed to have worked with other members on this site and none of them came to his defense?
Please correct me if I am wrong but he only mentioned me, and cyber. And as far as I remember I did come to his defense, and cyber had left by then.
I think he even claimed you and he worked on a project together at one point and part of the code is yours
I doubt that he said that, if it is true please feel free to post the link.
Not to mention his lines of code and file size ratio he gave can be proven a lie as the Linux Kernel was smaller than the size he claimed and had way more LOC than he claimed.
I am sorry but I missed that part of the thread, and thus cannot comment on it.
For example, SpaceWorm in one post, claimed CyberWarfare was his brother, then in the anti-virus thread said he was just a guy he knew to only later backtrack and have some bs excuse about it being his brother and he doesn't like acknowledging his family members
The way I understand it is that he was trying not to link himself to his brother online, for security/tracking reasons. Just my possibility.
I doubt that he said that, if it is true please feel free to post the link.
Space Worm wrote:
Yeah, I know that dude ask Script Coder, he knows us two and we do talk to him often, at-least I do anyway I don't know bout Script Coder we did work on a project with him.
On the same thread you defended him on.
So you either did or you didn't work on a project with Space Worm and CyberWarfare. From your reaction I'd venture to say you have no clue what he is referring to.
Not really. This thread is divisive and inconclusive. Those threads host discussions which, while not explicitly constructive, actually result in deeper personal ties between members, albeit via an impersonal mechanism, and thus promote positive forum cohesion.
This thread isn't useless. It is way more useful then talking about Barbie, porn, etc..
Those topics aren't really useless either. Barbies, I could be discussing that if I was making a PC game of Barbie character for my niece. Porn, maybe I'm making a serious game and want to know how much nudity/sex/sexual references would be pushing it beyond a game.
Even the most 'useless' post can spark the best idea for something.
From your reaction I'd venture to say you have no clue what he is referring to.
Please not that my response was in relation to:
BHXSpecter wrote:
part of the code is yours
Which is a very vague statement, and I assumed you were referring to his AV, which had nothing to do with.
I did form programming groups with both cyber and space worm.
cire wrote:
I, for one, could do without amateur internet detectives.
Who was being a detective, and how was it amateur?
retsgorf297 wrote:
It is way more useful then talking about Barbie, porn, etc..
Have those been actual topics or are you just conjecturing possible "useless" topics?
deeper personal ties between members
From that, I understand that you are saying that conversation about children's playthings and sex on an online programming website strengthens personal ties amongst members. Am I misinterpreting something?
Barbie + porn = Barbie porn?
Okay now you are just getting ridiculous, but I cannot deny I though the same thing when those words were grouped in the same sentence.
From that, I understand that you are saying that conversation about children's playthings and sex on an online programming website strengthens personal ties amongst members. Am I misinterpreting something?
No, you're not misinterpreting, that's exactly what I'm saying. Verbal communication is the primary way humans learn about each other and form interpersonal bonds. It doesn't matter what the topic is.