Problem in Template

[Umair Khan]

Error Occured: no matching function for call to `search(int)'
as I gave the def of search(Object data)
using template so why it is not recognizing.
I implemented insert_at_tail(Object data) using same template approach but it is not compiling this time :(

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

template <class Object>

class Linked_List
{
private:

struct Node
{
Object info;
Node *next;

Node() : info(0), next(NULL)
{ }
};

Node *head;
Node *tail;
int no_of_rec;

public:

Linked_List(): head(NULL), tail(NULL), no_of_rec(0)
{ }

Node* create_node()
{
no_of_rec++;
return new Node;
}

void free_node(Node *p)
{
p->next = NULL;
no_of_rec--;
delete p;
}


void insert_at_tail(Object data)
{
Node *p;
p = create_node();
p->info = data;

if(tail == NULL)
tail = p;
else
tail->next = p;

p->next = NULL;
if(head == NULL)
head = p;
tail = p;
}
void destroy_list()
{
Node *temp = head;
while(head != NULL)
{
temp = head;
head = head->next;
free_node(temp);
}
}

void display_list()
{
cout << endl << "Contents of the List are: " << endl;

Node *current;
current = head;
while(current != NULL)
{
cout << current->info << endl;
current = current->next;
}

}

int size()
{ return no_of_rec; }

~Linked_List()
{ destroy_list(); }

bool search(Object data)
{
Node* p = head;
while(p != NULL)
{
if(p->info == data)
break;
p = p->next;
}

if(p == NULL)
return false;

else
return true;

}


};

int main()
{
Linked_List<int> L1;

L1.insert_at_tail(1);
L1.insert_at_tail(2);
L1.insert_at_tail(3);
L1.insert_at_tail(4);

L1.display_list();

bool found = false;
found = search(4);

if(found == true)
cout << "Found" << endl;
else
cout << "Not Found" << endl;

return 0;
}

[firedraco]

Put some code tags around that and paste the entire error (with line numbers) please.

[Umair Khan]

there is only one error in the compilation and the error line is function call:
found = serach(4);
I didn't call the search func in any other place

[shacktar]

Your call to search isn't tied to an instance of Linked_List. Try L1.search(4);

[Umair Khan]

stupid mistake:(
Sorry people but thanks