syntax in uml class diagram

[mike9407]

i having problem to read attractions:Attraction[*] and Malls:string[*}
what is this mean?

[kbw]

It isn't clear what you mean. Can you please explain further.

[mike9407]

do u familiar with UML class diagram?

[kbw]

Yes.

[mike9407]

this 2 are the private data from the class, what is that mean?

[MikeyBoy]

You know that a class can have private members, and public members, right?

[kbw]

In UML, this is an association.

[mike9407]

i mean the data type how to implement is it array or pointers?

[kbw]

I am not clear on the details of the relationship is. If the relationship is association, you can implement that with a member, or a pointer. If it's a 0+ multiplicity, you'll end up using a collection of pointers.

I use the term pointer, but never use them directly, wrap them in unique_ptr or smart_ptr (or equivalents).

Also, never use arrays directly. Always use a container instead.

[mike9407]

any others people woh know this can comment?

[MikeyBoy]

Can you be more specific about what you want to know? What is it that hasn't already been answered in this thread?

[RUNNER PRO AGARIO]

BE MORE SPECIFIC SHOW YOUR DIAGRAM

[mike9407]

my problem i already indicated on top

[RUNNER PRO AGARIO]

Its not clear enough, mike, be specific, and also learn how to ask questions here.

[TarikNeaj]

@RPA. Let's move on with our lifes, it's well known that @mike is trolling.

[RUNNER PRO AGARIO]

True that.

[mike9407]

I am not trolling, i am asking serious question

[RUNNER PRO AGARIO]

Prove your worth by properly explaining to us.

[MikeyBoy]

So - the post accusing @mike9407 of being a troll is left here, but my post in which I try and explain to Mike why his posts are leading people to think he's a troll, in the hope that he can improve his posting style, is deleted?

That seems a rather... eccentric admin decision.