- Forum
- General C++ Programming
- my composed C++ ebook
my composed C++ ebook
i have composed a C++ pdf book, (collection of learncpp.com tutorials.)
which describes C++ in a very CLEAR & EASY way!
pages 599, size 3MB,
free view\download:
from google docs>
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B24Ki1Y3V2tzRnIweUZOVGtwSjA/edit?usp=sharing
from 4shared.com>
http://www.4shared.com/office/7LXpHj4mce/Learn_C_A_Handmade_Book_v17.html
which describes C++ in a very CLEAR & EASY way!
pages 599, size 3MB,
free view\download:
from google docs>
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B24Ki1Y3V2tzRnIweUZOVGtwSjA/edit?usp=sharing
from 4shared.com>
http://www.4shared.com/office/7LXpHj4mce/Learn_C_A_Handmade_Book_v17.html
Last edited on
Has anyone downloaded this yet? And checked if it has virus? (Sorry anup30, i have just had previous bad experiences with such things)
lol, i am learning programming - i don't have enough knowledge to create a virus!
i made the book (collection tutorials) to learn offline. i shared them because that tutorials are described so clear and friendly and easy way - that i didn't find in any other C++ website! you will agree if you see the highly praised comments of the site.
and seriously, you can check the download URL >
https://www.virustotal.com/
i have added google docs link, now anyone can view or download without login.
i made the book (collection tutorials) to learn offline. i shared them because that tutorials are described so clear and friendly and easy way - that i didn't find in any other C++ website! you will agree if you see the highly praised comments of the site.
and seriously, you can check the download URL >
https://www.virustotal.com/
i have added google docs link, now anyone can view or download without login.
A few notes:
1) EDIT: removed out of laziness to clarify.
2) Programming languages have no sense of "fast". Often is the case that a C program is faster than an equivalent hand-written assembly program. Not many now adays are familiar enough with a specific CPU to optimize better than a mature compiler.
3) The compiler doesn't have to compile to machine language. The standard specifies no such requirement, only the behavior of the compiled code.
4) While the ".cpp" extension is common, it's again not standard. Many compilers don't give a damn about the extension of the file used, and other common extensions that aren't mentioned are .C, .c++, and .cc.
That's it for now... I didn't read all of it given it's 600 pages long.
1) EDIT: removed out of laziness to clarify.
2) Programming languages have no sense of "fast". Often is the case that a C program is faster than an equivalent hand-written assembly program. Not many now adays are familiar enough with a specific CPU to optimize better than a mature compiler.
3) The compiler doesn't have to compile to machine language. The standard specifies no such requirement, only the behavior of the compiled code.
4) While the ".cpp" extension is common, it's again not standard. Many compilers don't give a damn about the extension of the file used, and other common extensions that aren't mentioned are .C, .c++, and .cc.
That's it for now... I didn't read all of it given it's 600 pages long.
Last edited on
Topic archived. No new replies allowed.