bitcopy versus initialization

[jageera]

// A class that counts its objects
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
ofstream out("HowMany.out");

class HowMany {
static int objectCount;
public:
HowMany() { objectCount++; }
static void print(const string& msg = "") {
if(msg.size() != 0) out << msg << ": ";
out << "objectCount = "
<< objectCount << endl;
}
~HowMany() {
objectCount--;
print("~HowMany()");
}
};

int HowMany::objectCount = 0;

// Pass and return BY VALUE:
HowMany f(HowMany x) {
x.print("x argument inside f()");
return x;
}

int main() {
HowMany h;
HowMany::print("after construction of h");
HowMany h2 = f(h);
HowMany::print("after call to f()");
} ///:~


Output:
after construction of h: objectCount = 1
x argument inside f(): objectCount = 1
~HowMany(): objectCount = 0
after call to f(): objectCount = 0
~HowMany(): objectCount = -1
~HowMany(): objectCount = -2


Will any one tell me the reason behind the output not coming as expected.What exactly is this "bitcopy"?
Any link with relevant info will do.
Thanx in advance

[gelatine]

please use code and ouput formats: (i have just copied this to make it easier for people to answer this.)

#include <fstream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
ofstream out("HowMany.out");

class HowMany {
static int objectCount;
public:
HowMany() { objectCount++; }
static void print(const string& msg = "") {
if(msg.size() != 0) out << msg << ": ";
out << "objectCount = "
<< objectCount << endl;
}
~HowMany() {
objectCount--;
print("~HowMany()");
}
};

int HowMany::objectCount = 0;

// Pass and return BY VALUE:
HowMany f(HowMany x) {
x.print("x argument inside f()");
return x;
}

int main() {
HowMany h;
HowMany::print("after construction of h");
HowMany h2 = f(h);
HowMany::print("after call to f()");
} ///:~ 

after construction of h: objectCount = 1
x argument inside f(): objectCount = 1
~HowMany(): objectCount = 0
after call to f(): objectCount = 0
~HowMany(): objectCount = -1
~HowMany(): objectCount = -2

[guestgulkan]

jageera wrote:

Will any one tell me the reason behind the output not coming as expected.

Because you have not provided your own copy constructor - the default
compiler provided copy constructor isn't going to update the objectCount variable.
So when the compiler creates the parameter to pass to the f function and to create the return object from from the f function - it uses the copy constructor, which does not update the objectCount variable, but your destructors decreses the objectCount variable when these objects get destructed - so there is a mistatch in the record keeping between objects created and objects deleted destructed.