Forcing C++ compiler to run as C compiler?
Zhuge: I think I am the wrong person to ask. =]
jsmith: Of course, but not what I asked.
moorecm: True, I looked through it, but nothing popped out at me. It is quite long, you know? For easy access: http://linux.die.net/man/1/gcc
jsmith: Of course, but not what I asked.
moorecm: True, I looked through it, but nothing popped out at me. It is quite long, you know? For easy access: http://linux.die.net/man/1/gcc
Interesting, why are you want to do that?
If you like c, than just write c, please don't write c in c++
It is always a nightmare and a bad habits to write "x language" in "y language"
I saw a lot of guys like that
They like to write c in c++, c in java, c in c#, assembly in c, pascal in c and so on
This always make the code hard to read, maintain, error prone and low efficient
Maybe you have your special reasons for that?
If you like c, than just write c, please don't write c in c++
It is always a nightmare and a bad habits to write "x language" in "y language"
I saw a lot of guys like that
They like to write c in c++, c in java, c in c#, assembly in c, pascal in c and so on
This always make the code hard to read, maintain, error prone and low efficient
Maybe you have your special reasons for that?
Last edited on
stereoMatching: This doesn't really have anything to do with what you're talking about.
Just wondering if there was an option like this.
Just wondering if there was an option like this.
stereoMatching, I can see how one could 'write c in c++'. How can you write C in Java, C#, etc... (not that I intend to do it: I'm just curious)?
Isn't the inline assembler useful for low level access / fine tuned optimisation?
| assembly in c |
Isn't the inline assembler useful for low level access / fine tuned optimisation?
A C++ compiler is a C++ compiler and a C compiler is a C compiler. You can compile most C code with C++ compilers anyways, and the parts you can't you can still compile with a C compiler and link with a C++ linker(if you wrap your header in an
extern "C" block).
not that I intend to do it: I'm just curious)?
I mean they never try to understand the benefits and the defects of oop
Never want to realize higher abstraction
Only treat java and c# as some kind of "c with GC"
Isn't the inline assembler useful for low level access / fine tuned optimisation?
Maybe you are right, since I didn't spend my time to decipher the code
I mean they never try to understand the benefits and the defects of oop
Never want to realize higher abstraction
Only treat java and c# as some kind of "c with GC"
Isn't the inline assembler useful for low level access / fine tuned optimisation?
Maybe you are right, since I didn't spend my time to decipher the code
Last edited on
Topic archived. No new replies allowed.