using the 0x standard

[iw0XoG1T]

If I am using the gcc compiler am I able to use the 0x standard library? If so what is it called(e.g. is it called -lstdc++0x)?

[Lv0f92yv]

This might be useful: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html

[tummychow]

Is 0x even released yet?

[iw0XoG1T]

Thanks I did go to that site first, when I use the "-std=c++0x" flag it works, but I seem to be having trouble using the regex library.
When I use it with boost::regex it requires an additional library(-lboost_regex). If any one has an example that compiles using regex from the "0x" standard library I would appreciate it.

[helios]

Well, boost::regex is part of Boost. What do you expect?

[iw0XoG1T]

My understanding is that boost::regex will be part of the 0x standard library--so my assumption was that if I was using 0x standard library I would be able to use regex without an additional library.

[helios]

But it won't be incorporated as boost::regex, just like std::vector wasn't incorporated as stl::vector.

[iw0XoG1T]

I took a wild ass guess that it would be included as std::regex; but it did not compile--so what I was trying to ask (which I guess I did not make clear) was a request for an example that does compile using regex and the "0x" standard library.

I don't know if regex is available when you use the "-std=c++0x" flag with the gcc compiler--my hope was that someone who is familiar with gcc compiler and the "0x" standard library could point me in the right direction.

[iw0XoG1T]

This looks like the answer to my question:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#id476343

As far as I can tell it has not been fully implemented so I guess I will continue to have to use use the boost library.