The creator simply forgot to include that DLL, it is not part of the package.
Orwell's Dev-C++ hasn't been updated in over a year, is not likely to ever be updated, and was using an outdated compiler (GCC 4.9.2) with the last version released.
You should consider getting a different IDE, one that is actively supported and updated. Two that work well are Visual Studio 2015 and Code::Blocks. Both are free.
Okay, no. Orwell Dev-C++ may start showing signs of age, but Visual C++ 2008 is definitely a no-go. davBams, if you decide to follow FurryGuy's advice to go with a different IDE and choose Visual Studio, I'd strongly recommend going with the latest version of it.
Get a good complier, for example : Visual C++ 2008 portable
Good God. Why on earth would you recommend an IDE/compiler that's almost a decade out of date, when the most recent version is freely available? Are you trolling?
If you do decide to get VS 2015 you should do a custom install, Visual C++ is not installed on a default install.
If you do decide to get VS 2015, here's an introduction to debugging with VS:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2015/08/11/introduction-to-debugging.aspx
If you have any questions about VS 2015, or Code:Blocks, don't hesitate to ask here. :)
> Why on earth would you recommend an IDE/compiler that's almost a decade out of date, when the most recent version is freely available?
Thank you for pointing this out. I didn't know Visual C++ 2015 Community was totally free.
I also didn't know that Visual C++ 2008 was even older than Dev-C++, even I also did use it in the past.
My stupid insight is that a portable C++ complier may be convenient and sufficent :X