@cire Thanks a bunch! I implemented it and it works as you intended. Great to see it working.
From here on, I guess I'll think of changing my code so that it can encrypt both capital and lower-case letters as input.
By the way, out of interest, what difference would it make if I store the Latin letters into a string instead into an array? I didn't think of it the first time and directly went with using an array, but now I changed it to a string and the result is the same.
I don't think there's much difference with the code you have.
An alternate approach would be to use two strings. One string to relate a letter to an index. The other string to map that index to a different letter.
You could begin with the strings equal. Shuffle one. Search the unaltered one to find the letter you want to encode. The index you find it at should be used to index the other shuffled string to get the encoded version of the letter. (If you don't find the character in the string, perhaps just leave it unchanged.)
That approach has the advantage of being extensible. If you want to add a character to encode, you just add it to both strings at the beginning of the process.