m4ster r0shi, you dan't call end of discussion like that. Seriously... not cool.
Hadronization is spontaneous, but that doesn't mean it doesn't absorb energy. We don't know all the details, but we do know that a system tends to move toward the lowest level of potential energy (usually entropy is higher at that point, but not always), and that the system may even overcome barriers to get to that lower level. A perfect example of that is a siphon.
Was that a reply to me? HCs is an artificial way to do this and it does consume a lot of energy to do this. I meant that quarks in nature are always found as parts of a hadron.
Albatross wrote:
Hadronization is spontaneous, but that doesn't mean it doesn't absorb energy.
Ok, I thought you weren't convinced about the first one. Yes, maybe you are right about the rest.
quarks in nature are always found as parts of a hadron.
In the early Universe the energy was so condensed that hadrons could not form. All the mass was in the form of free quarks and other similar particles
We don't see free quarks on Earth but that doesn't mean that they cannot be found naturally in other parts of the Universe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark%E2%80%93gluon_plasma
@Albatross,
There's an awful lot you could tell about a person by their shoes. Where they're going. Where they've been. I've worn lots of shoes. I bet if I think about it real hard I could remember my first pair of shoes.
@m4ster r0shi,
I especially like the way that code won't compile because you didn't declare strlen :)
Having said that, illegible, non-sensical code is very fun to write: http://pastebin.com/pxR5furq
Edit: moved to pastebin -- too long
blackcoder41.shout_out("I'm late in this forum");
blackcoder41.talk(Albatross, "You can't just call tortillahead's protected or maybe private reply() method");